Comparison of mortality between private for-profit and private not-for-profit hemodialysis centers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
نویسندگان
چکیده
CONTEXT Private for-profit and private not-for-profit dialysis facilities provide the majority of hemodialysis care in the United States. There has been extensive debate about whether the profit status of these facilities influences patient mortality. OBJECTIVE To determine whether a difference in adjusted mortality rates exists between hemodialysis patients receiving care in private for-profit vs private not-for-profit dialysis centers. DATA SOURCES We searched 11 bibliographic databases, reviewed our own files, and contacted experts in June 2001-January 2002. In June 2002, we also searched PubMed using the "related articles" feature, SciSearch, and the reference lists of all studies that fulfilled our eligibility criteria. STUDY SELECTION We included published and unpublished observational studies that directly compared the mortality rates of hemodialysis patients in private for-profit and private not-for-profit dialysis centers and provided adjusted mortality rates. We masked the study results prior to determining study eligibility, and teams of 2 reviewers independently evaluated the eligibility of all studies. Eight observational studies that included more than 500 000 patient-years of data fulfilled our eligibility criteria. DATA EXTRACTION Teams of 2 reviewers independently abstracted data on study characteristics, sampling method, data sources, and factors controlled for in the analyses. Reviewers resolved disagreements by consensus. DATA SYNTHESIS The studies reported data from January 1, 1973, through December 31, 1997, and included a median of 1342 facilities per study. Six of the 8 studies showed a statistically significant increase in adjusted mortality in for-profit facilities, 1 showed a nonsignificant trend toward increased mortality in for-profit facilities, and 1 showed a nonsignificant trend toward decreased mortality in for-profit facilities. The pooled estimate, using a random-effects model, demonstrated that private for-profit dialysis centers were associated with an increased risk of death (relative risk, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.13; P<.001). This relative risk suggests that there are annually 2500 (with a plausible range of 1200-4000) excessive premature deaths in US for-profit dialysis centers. CONCLUSIONS Hemodialysis care in private not-for-profit centers is associated with a lower risk of mortality compared with care in private for-profit centers.
منابع مشابه
A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing mortality rates of private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals.
BACKGROUND Canadians are engaged in an intense debate about the relative merits of private for-profit versus private not-for-profit health care delivery. To inform this debate, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the mortality rates of private for-profit hospitals and those of private not-for-profit hospitals. METHODS We identified studies through an electr...
متن کاملPayments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND It has been shown that patients cared for at private for-profit hospitals have higher risk-adjusted mortality rates than those cared for at private not-for-profit hospitals. Uncertainty remains, however, about the economic implications of these forms of health care delivery. Since some policy-makers might still consider for-profit health care if expenditure savings were sufficiently ...
متن کاملMeta-analysis (systematic review) of profit management antecedents and explaining the effect of company size adjuster
The purpose of the present study is to meta-analyze (systematic review) of profit management antecedents and explain the moderating effect of company size. The statistical population of the article is 100 articles and dissertations published during the years 1387 to 1398. Based on the research method, 48 studies were reviewed as the final sample. The present study was done by meta-analysis usin...
متن کاملCaesarean sections and for-profit status of hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE Financial incentives may encourage private for-profit providers to perform more caesarean section (CS) than non-profit hospitals. We therefore sought to determine the association of for-profit status of hospital and odds of CS. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from the first year of records thr...
متن کاملNew Provider Models for Sweden and Spain: Public, Private or Non-profit?; Comment on “Governance, Government, and the Search for New Provider Models”
Sweden and Spain experiment with different provider models to reform healthcare provision. Both models have in common that they extend the role of the for-profit sector in healthcare. As the analysis of Saltman and Duran demonstrates, privatisation is an ambiguous and contested strategy that is used for quite different purposes. In our comment, we emphasize that their analysis leaves questions ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- JAMA
دوره 288 19 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002